Search for: "Herengracht Group LLC" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Merely Being a "Sophisticated Company" Does Not Impute an "Intent to Deceive" for False Marking Claim
21 Sep 2010, 1:33 pm by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog - http://271patent.blogspot.com/
Do false marking complaints need to satisfy heightened pleading requirements? Court won't answer that question if the complaint falls short of Rule 8
9 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Woodrow Pollack
But Plaintiff did not, so the court closed this matter.Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
Florida IP - http://floridaip.blogspot.com/
Difficulty Determining Expiration of Patent Requires False Marking Complaint to Plead Knowledge of Expiration with Specificity
5 Jan 2011, 7:48 am by The Docket Navigator
" Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
Intent to Deceive Element of False Marking Claim Cannot be Inferred from:
24 Nov 2010, 6:38 am by The Docket Navigator
" Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
General Global Week in Review 27 September 2010 from IP Think Tank
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
Graphic Management Associates, Inc (Docket Report) Merely being a ‘sophisticated company’ does not impute an ‘intent to deceive’ for false marking claim: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
General Global Week in Review 10 January 2011 from IP Think Tank
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
Chattem Inc., et. al., (Docket Report) M D Florida: Difficulty determining expiration of patent requires false marking complaint to plead knowledge of expiration with specificity: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
General Global Week in Review 29 November 2010 from IP Think Tank
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
Hydro-Quebec (Green Patent Blog) (Patent Prospector) District Court Colombia: Stryker’s challenge of USPTO ruling in bone screw interference struck down: Stryker Spine v Biedermann Motech (Patent Docs) District Court S D Florida: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from failure to pay maintenance fees and later revision of product packaging: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog